Legal Professionals to Train AI

Attorney and Other Legal Professionals (AI Training)

Latitude is looking for experienced legal professionals to evaluate how frontier AI models handle real legal work for one of its clients: research memos, contract review and drafting, motion and brief sections, compliance analyses, due diligence summaries and regulatory responses. You bring the judgment you have built marking up a junior’s memo, checking a research trail before relying on it, and redlining a draft until it is the one you would sign.

In this role, you will design challenging, realistic tasks drawn from your own practice, such as a research memo on a discrete question, a contract redline with an issues list, a section of a motion or brief, a compliance gap analysis, a due diligence summary, a discovery plan, or a response to a regulator, run them through frontier AI agents, and evaluate what comes back against a professional standard. You will work with realistic professional files, the kind a practitioner in your field actually handles, which you assemble yourself. Some tasks are compact, built around a handful of files; others are larger scenarios that take several days to build. In every case the goal is the same: a task a competent professional in your field would complete correctly and a frontier model currently gets wrong.

This is not a traditional law role. You will be helping build better AI by putting your knowledge to work in a structured, flexible, fully remote environment. The work is long form and self directed, and clear written reasoning matters as much as technical depth.

Key Responsibilities

• Design challenging, realistic legal tasks drawn from your own day-to-day work. Examples include a research memo on a discrete legal question, a contract redline with an accompanying issues list, a section of a motion or brief, a compliance gap analysis, a due diligence summary, a discovery plan, or a response to a regulatory inquiry
• Write each task prompt the way you would brief a trusted colleague, with the context, constraints, and expectations a real assignment would carry
• Author the realistic supporting files a professional would need to complete the task, such as agreements, pleadings, correspondence, internal policies, fact summaries, and exhibits
• Run your tasks through frontier AI models and evaluate the deliverable they produce (the memo, redline, brief section, or analysis) against the standard you would hold a colleague to
• Compare two AI model outputs produced from identical prompts and files, decide which performed better, and document in writing where each one fell short
• Write detailed grading rubrics that specify what a correct deliverable must contain, including the right issues spotted, the right authorities applied, the right contract provisions flagged, and the right tone and register for the intended recipient
• Explain in writing why a given AI response passes or fails each rubric criterion
• Flag concrete failures with supporting evidence, including fabricated or misread authorities, the wrong legal standard applied, missed issues, ignored provisions, conclusions the facts do not support, and misinterpretations of what the assignment actually asked for
• Review and evaluate AI-generated responses to legal prompts for accuracy, clarity, and professional appropriateness, and annotate and rank model outputs to guide AI training
• Contribute across litigation, transactional, compliance and regulatory, and intellectual property work, and, as you gain experience, review and refine tasks built by other legal experts
• Submit task proposals for expert review, then build accepted tasks in full and iterate based on written reviewer feedback
• Follow detailed written instructions precisely, including document formatting and file upload requirements
• Maintain consistent quality and throughput throughout the sprint engagement

General Requirements

• 2+ years of hands on experience in your field preferred.
• Full professional or native level written and spoken English, with strong written communication. You can explain complex professional reasoning clearly and concisely, and articulate why a result is wrong, not only that it is.
• Comfort with ambiguity and attention to detail. You can orient in a new set of files and build an accurate, deep working picture of it quickly, especially when the subject sits partly outside your own specialization. You verify what a document claims against the u…