Staff Software Engineer (AI Evals)

Contract | $100–$200/hour | 20-40 hrs/week | Start ASAP We’re looking for highly experienced software engineer to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.

This is not a traditional engineering role.

You won’t be writing production code.

You’ll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer. **What This Role Actually Is** You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios — focusing on:

• Whether the response makes sense
• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful
• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment
• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer

This role is about engineering taste — not syntax correctness.

**What You’ll Be Doing**

• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end-to-end

• Judge whether outputs are:

• Useful
• Correct (at a high level)

• Aligned with how a strong engineer would think

• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just code
• Distinguish between different levels of response quality (e.g. what makes something a 2 vs 4)

• Provide clear, opinionated feedback on:

• What worked
• What didn’t

• What felt “off” or misleading

• Help define what great looks like when interacting with tools like Cursor

**What We Mean by “Taste”** We’re specifically looking for engineers who can answer questions like:

• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?
• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?
• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?
• Would this interaction build or erode trust?

You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments .

**Who You Are**

• Staff / Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)

• Strong background in one of the below:

• Go
• Python
• Rust

• TypeScript / JavaScript

• Hands-on experience using:

• OpenAI Codex
• Claude Code

• Cursor

• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows
• Able to evaluate code without needing to fully execute or deeply review every line
• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback
• High bar for what “good engineering” looks like

**Nice to Have**

• Experience with tools like Cursor or similar AI-first IDEs
• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows
• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards

**Engagement Details**

• Rate: $100–$200/hour
• Hours: ~20 hours+
• Duration: Through October w/possible extentions
• Start: ASAP

• Process:

• Take-home evaluation exercise
• Background Check
• Offer